Morstyn, T., Farrell, N., Darby, S. J. & McCulloch, M. D. Utilizing peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to kind federated energy vegetation. Nat. Vitality 3, 94–101 (2018).
Parag, Y. & Sovacool, B. Ok. Electrical energy market design for the prosumer period. Nat. Vitality 1, 16032 (2016).
Liu, X. & Mancarella, P. Modelling, evaluation and sankey diagrams of built-in electrical energy–warmth–gasoline networks in multi-vector district power methods. Appl. Vitality 167, 336–352 (2016).
Thomas, L., Zhou, Y., Lengthy, C., Wu, J. & Jenkins, N. A common type of sensible contract for decentralized power methods administration. Nat. Vitality 4, 140–149 (2019).
Kargarian, A. et al. Towards distributed/decentralized DC optimum energy stream implementation in future electrical energy methods. IEEE Trans. Sensible Grid 9, 2574–2594 (2018).
Andoni, M. et al. Blockchain know-how within the power sector: a scientific evaluate of challenges and alternatives. Renew. Sust. Vitality Rev. 100, 143–174 (2019).
Di Silvestre, M. L. et al. Blockchain for energy methods: present tendencies and future purposes. Renew. Sust. Vitality Rev. 119, 109585 (2020).
Belotti, M., Božić, N., Pujolle, G. & Secci, S. A vademecum on blockchain applied sciences: when, which, and the way. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21, 3796–3838 (2019).
Hassan, N. U., Yuen, C. & Niyato, D. Blockchain applied sciences for sensible power methods: fundamentals, challenges, and options. IEEE Ind. Electron. Magazine. 13, 106–118 (2019).
Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Digital Money System (Bitcoin, 2008).
Etherscan (Etherscan, 2015); https://etherscan.io/
Complete Information to Firms Concerned in Blockchain & Vitality (SolarPlaza, 2018).
Li, J., Li, N., Peng, J., Cui, H. & Wu, Z. Vitality consumption of cryptocurrency mining: a examine of electrical energy consumption in mining cryptocurrencies. Vitality 168, 160–168 (2019).
Kiayias, A., Russell, A., David, B. & Oliynykov, R. A Provably Safe Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol. In Annual Worldwide Cryptology Convention (eds Katz, J. et al.) 357–388 (Springer, 2017).
Fan, X. & Chai, Q. Roll-DPoS: a randomized delegated proof of stake scheme for scalable blockchain-based Web of issues methods. In Proc. fifteenth EAI Worldwide Convention on Cellular and Ubiquitous Techniques: Computing, Networking and Providers (eds Schulzrinne, H. et al.) 482–484 (ACM, 2018).
Rouhani, S. & Deters, R. Efficiency evaluation of Ethereum transactions in non-public blockchain. In eighth IEEE Worldwide Convention on Software program Engineering and Service Science (eds Li, W. et al.) 70–74 (IEEE, 2017).
Miller, A., Juels, A., Shi, E., Parno, B. & Katz, J. Permacoin: repurposing Bitcoin work for information preservation. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on Safety and Privateness (eds Shannon, G.) 475–490 (IEEE, 2014).
Castro, M. & Liskov, B. Sensible Byzantine fault tolerance. OSDI ’99: Proc. third symposium on Working methods design and implementation. (eds Seltzer, M. et al.) 173–186 (USENIX Affiliation, 1999).
Su, Z. et al. A safe charging scheme for electrical autos with sensible communities in power blockchain. IEEE Web Issues J. 6, 4601–4613 (2019).
Tushar, W., Saha, T. Ok., Yuen, C., Smith, D. & Poor, H. V. Peer-to-peer buying and selling in electrical energy networks: an outline. IEEE Trans. Sensible Grid 11, 3185–3200 (2020).
Tushar, W. et al. Challenges and prospects for negawatt buying and selling in gentle of current technological developments. Nat. Vitality 5, 834–841 (2020).
Tushar, W. et al. Peer-to-peer power methods for related communities: a evaluate of current advances and rising challenges. Appl. Vitality 282, 116131 (2021).
Molzahn, D. Ok. et al. A survey of distributed optimization and management algorithms for electrical energy methods. IEEE Trans. Sensible Grid 8, 2941 – 2962 (2017).
AlAshery, M. Ok. et al. A blockchain-enabled multi-settlement quasi-ideal peer-to-peer buying and selling framework. IEEE Trans. Sensible Grid 12, 885–896 (2020).
Shibata, N. Proof-of-search: combining blockchain consensus formation with fixing optimization issues. IEEE Entry 7, 172994–173006 (2019).
Luo, F., Dong, Z. Y., Liang, G., Murata, J. & Xu, Z. A distributed electrical energy buying and selling system in lively distribution networks based mostly on multi-agent coalition and blockchain. IEEE Trans. Energy Syst. 34, 4097–4108 (2019).
Li, Y., Yang, W., He, P., Chen, C. & Wang, X. Design and administration of a distributed hybrid power system by means of sensible contract and blockchain. Appl. Vitality 248, 390–405 (2019).
Wang, S., Taha, A. F., Wang, J., Kvaternik, Ok. & Hahn, A. Vitality crowdsourcing and peer-to-peer power buying and selling in blockchain-enabled sensible grids. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 49, 1612–1623 (2019).
Di Silvestre, M. L. et al. Ancillary providers within the power blockchain for microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 55, 7310–7319 (2019).
Ott, A. L. Expertise with PJM market operation, system design, and implementation. IEEE Trans. Energy Syst. 18, 528–534 (2003).
Erseghe, T. Distributed optimum energy stream utilizing ADMM. IEEE Trans. Energy Syst. 29, 2370–2380 (2014).
Aguado, J. & Quintana, V. Inter-utilities power-exchange coordination: a market-oriented strategy. IEEE Trans. Energy Syst. 16, 513–519 (2001).
Le, X., Chen, S., Yan, Z. & Xi, J. A neurodynamic strategy to distributed optimization with globally coupled constraints. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 48, 3149–3158 (2018).
Chen, S., Xu, C., Yan, Z., Guan, X. & Le, X. Accommodating strategic gamers in distributed algorithms for energy dispatch issues. IEEE Trans. Cybern. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3085400 (2021).
Chen, S. et al. A trusted power buying and selling framework by marrying blockchain and optimization. Adv. Appl. Vitality 2, 100029 (2021).
Chen, S., Zhang, L., Yan, Z. & Shen, Z. A distributed and sturdy security-constrained financial dispatch algorithm based mostly on blockchain. IEEE Trans. Energy Syst. 37, 691–700 (2022).
Ping, J., Yan, Z., Chen, S., Yao, L. & Qian, M. Coordinating EV charging through blockchain. J. Mod. Energy Syst. Clear Vitality 8, 573–581 (2020).
Ping, J., Yan, Z. & Chen, S. A two-stage autonomous EV charging coordination methodology enabled by blockchain. J. Mod. Energy Syst. Clear Vitality 9, 104–113 (2021).
Conejo, A., Castillo, E., Minguez, R. & Garcia-Bertrand, R. in Decomposition Strategies in Mathematical Programming (eds Conejo, A. et al.) Ch. 1 (Springer, 2006).
Palomar, D. P. & Chiang, M. A tutorial on decomposition strategies for community utility maximization. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 24, 1439–1451 (2006).
Cao, Y. et al. Decentralized operation of interdependent energy distribution community and district heating community: a market-driven strategy. IEEE Trans. Sensible Grid 10, 5374–5385 (2019).
Liu, X., Yan, Z. & Wu, J. Optimum coordinated operation of a multi-energy group contemplating interactions between power storage and conversion gadgets. Appl. Vitality 248, 256–273 (2019).
Gilad, Y., Hemo, R., Micali, S., Vlachos, G. & Zeldovich, N. Algorand: scaling Byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies. In Proc. twenty sixth ACM Symposium on Working Techniques Ideas (eds Chen, H. et al.) 51–68 (ACM, 2017).
Milutinovic, M., He, W., Wu, H. & Kanwal, M. Proof of luck: an environment friendly blockchain consensus protocol. In Proc. 1st Workshop on System Software program for Trusted Execution (eds Felber, P. et al.) 1–6 (ACM, 2016).
Lamport, L., Shostark, R. & Pease, M. The Byzantine generals downside. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4, 382–401 (1982).